Fostering User Engagement: Rhetorical Devices for Applause Generation Learnt from TED Talks
نویسندگان
چکیده
One problem that every presenter faces when delivering a public discourse is how to hold the listeners’ attentions or to keep them involved. Therefore, many studies in conversation analysis work on this issue and suggest qualitatively constructions that can effectively lead to audience’s applause. To investigate these proposals quantitatively, in this study we analyze the transcripts of 2,135 TED Talks, with a particular focus on the rhetorical devices that are used by the presenters for applause elicitation. Through conducting regression analysis, we identify and interpret 24 rhetorical devices as triggers of audience applauding. We further build models that can recognize applause-evoking sentences and conclude this work with potential implications. Introduction and Motivation Many academic studies have been devoted to the tasks of user engagement characterization. However, applause, as the most direct audience reaction, has till now not been fully investigated and understood. The audience do not just clap whenever they like, they do so only at certain points and are continuously looking for appropriate times when applause can possibly occur (Kuo, 2001). Having a deep understanding of audience’s applause is important because it will help the speakers to better design their speech with recognizable calls for conjoined response, and to make their presentation more appealing and engageable. Despite its importance, to date relatively limited work have been conducted on the topic of applause generation, except a few qualitative studies done by social psychologists. Atkinson (1984) first claimed that applause is closely synchronized with a number of actions on the part of the speakers, which he referred to as “rhetorical devices”. He identified three rhetorical devices that are effective in evoking applauses, including: contrasts, three-part lists, and projection of names. Heritage and Greatbatch (1986) found five other basic rhetorical devices, including: puzzlesolution, headline-punchline, combination, position taking This is a pre-print of an article appearing at ICWSM 2017. and pursuit. In addition, new categories were also identified in many recent studies, such as greetings, expressing appreciations, etc. (Bull and Feldman, 2011). To date, research on applause generation has been limited to the analysis of political speeches only. Besides, all of the aforementioned work were conducted using qualitative methods. Many critical questions, such as, What triggers the audience’s applause?, When do audience applaud?, etc., remain unanswered. To address these gaps, this work aims to identify the rhetorical devices for applause elicitation using data-driven methods. To this end, we propose two research questions: RQ1: What are the rhetorical devices that cause the audiences to applaud during a specific part of a speech? RQ2: To what extent the hypothesized rhetorical devices can be used to predict applause generation? To answer both questions, we crawl 2,135 TED talk transcripts and conduct quantitative analysis to investigate the factors that could trigger audience’s applause. We find that factors such as, gratitude expressions, phonetic structure, projection of names, emotion, etc., have significant effects on applause generation. These identified factors are later used to build machine learning models that can automatically identify applause-evoking segments.
منابع مشابه
Visual, Laughter, Applause and Spoken Expression Features for Predicting Engagement Within TED Talks
There is an enormous amount of audio-visual content available on-line in the form of talks and presentations. The prospective users of the content face difficulties in finding the right content for them. However, automatic detection of interesting (engaging vs. non-engaging) content can help users to find the videos according to their preferences. It can also be helpful for a recommendation and...
متن کاملGeneration of Ideologically-Biased Historical Documentaries
Terminal Time is a machine that constructs ideologicallybiased documentary histories in response to audience feedback. The audience answers multiple-choice questions via an applause meter. The answers to these questions influence which historical events are chosen from a knowledge base, how these events will be slanted to embody the bias implied in the audience's answers, and how the events wil...
متن کاملTowards a conversational expert system for rhetorical and vocal quality assessment in call center talks
This article presents the concept and development steps towards a conversational expert system for rhetorical and vocal quality assessment in call center talks. At first the state of the art in quality assessment is discussed. The influencing rhetorical and vocal factors are introduced. In our novel approach, the recognition of vocal factors is modeled by competing classification systems and co...
متن کاملAn Arabic-Hebrew parallel corpus of TED talks
We describe an Arabic-Hebrew parallel corpus of TED talks built upon WIT, the Web inventory that repurposes the original content of the TED website in a way which is more convenient for MT researchers. The benchmark consists of about 2,000 talks, whose subtitles in Arabic and Hebrew have been accurately aligned and rearranged in sentences, for a total of about 3.5M tokens per language. Talks ha...
متن کاملBuilding a Framework for the Influence of Digital Content on Student Course Engagement
Grounded in the Motivated Learning Strategies Model, this paper proposes a testable framework to explore how access to digital information impacts learning through examining the mediating factor of engagement. While the implications of patterns of behavior on learning and learning outcomes are significant, we first must understand what drives students to engage with their course content in the ...
متن کامل